Originally Posted by Lisentia
Just to toss some information into this discussion -

According to the BG3 Steam Store Page, there have been a total of ~32,000 reviews and ~1200 recent reviews. Of those reviews, enough are considered positive by the Steam metrics to warrant being labeled as Very Positive.

In conclusion, I'm not sure that the anecdotal accusations or confirmation bias is warranted to claim any one is part of a vocal minority or majority.
it als odropped from 88% positive on average to 85% positive.

Given that a lot of players are still in their honeymoon phase is NOT the most flattering of the results.
Basically any big production that isn't absolute trash or that didn't piss off enough people to be focus of massive review bombing in some peculiar episode can aspire to comparable or better ratings on Steam.
DOS 2 had a 96% positive rating at some point and it's still at 94% today with recent reviews.

Originally Posted by Pandemonica
Yes, but knowledge of 5e rules do not translate to experience with building a mass produced computer RPG.
I wasn't even talking specifically about knowledge of the 5th edition at all. I have hardly any myself.
Just understanding of mechanics in a game you play and their large scale implications.
So I really don't know what to do with the rest of your tirade built over a wrong assumption.

Let's take the rest system for instance. Do you people think that perfect adherence to the 5th edition is the problem with it? Or maybe more the fact that is such a poorly structured system to the point of not even feeling like a system at all, but rather some sort of clumsy leftover?

Last edited by Tuco; 18/02/21 05:11 PM.
Party control in Baldur's Gate 3 is a complete mess that begs to be addressed. SAY NO TO THE TOILET CHAIN