Originally Posted by Maximuuus
That's fun reading about "vocal minority" and dbate about what's "many players" or not...
Doesn't anyone remember those surveys ?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IgN2IAZi8Hho6X_7XpiW-0N_cUYEJvX8/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sip8wb8Yu1-N1FC7dDY72RJewnu3hqvz/view?usp=sharing

+- 1100 players answered, both from the official forum (501) and the reddit community (570).
Isn't that representative ?

Why should those asking for the game to think about those results should be called "vocal minority" ?
Because that's exactly what we're talking here on this forum. (Probably not on reddit anymore... it's been a long time since having a mind and a critical eye is no longer allowed on the BG3 sub)

Everyone could probably agree on many things if everyone was trying to understand things and other point of view.

You like dipping ? I could like dipping but not the way they implement it. Why would everyone reject something more immersive that becomes a meaningfull CHOICE ?
You like having bonuses through high ground ? I also like it but having tons of useless spells and features in a game is BAD.
You like backstab ? Why wouldn't you like flanking ? It would increase the synergies between melee characters A LOT.

There are tons of exemples we could talked about but it's a FACT that Larian implement things that break other things they implement...
It's a fact that they have broken (they will break) the balance and the usefullness of classes.
It's a fact that the difficulty of this game is a joke.

There are explanations... But of course it require a little bit more thinking than "cool, the druid is coming".

I forgot completely about them. But then again, I didn't receive them.