First of all, I want to preface that I agree with most of the criticism on the sub (not all of it, for example, I personally like the high ground mechanics, without it positioning is just whether or not you can see someone, but that's an entirely different conversation) however, I hate the way you are presenting it... Some of the people on here are extremely rude and extremely entitled.

So, please keep those next things in mind the next time you post something here:
1. They never promised they will try to replicate 5e as closely as they can, not even in the slightest. If you actually look at the interviews, when asked about the level of faithfulness they always said that they are using the 5e ruleset as the basis but changing it to fit the new medium better (this doesn't mean only changing stuff that can't be done on a computer, but also to make it more mechanically engaging since you aren't just describing what you are doing)
2. It's your fault if you bought an early access game and are disappointed. They were very clear that the purpose of the early access is for us to playtest the game, and it's not even close to fully realized.
3. There are zero reasons for you to be hostile towards the company in the way you are describing the issue you have with the game. Again, you chose to play the game in an unfinished state, and our only role right now is as playtesters.

Basically what I am trying to say is that you guys need to chill out and remember we are just playtesters providing feedback.

And one other thing, which is a bit unrelated, but I don't get people that say that the game doesn't feel like dnd. Yes, the game has some big deviations from the ruleset, but it's still 5e at its core. Look at it this way, what if you played a game of basketball with someone but they said that in their court the basket is half a meter higher and the 3 steps rule is changed to 4 steps. Are you really going the say that if you would play that you would feel like you are playing a different sport?