Well i support those changes..... but have anyone of you thought a little further?
Lets say all of this gets change the way it should be..... the encounters will have SUCH a dramatic dificulty spike without all the Larian cheese that they would have to rework most encounters. Now think about ALL the hundreds of encounters that have allready been designed also for act 2 and act 3...... suddenly you must rework them because Larian designed them with Larian cheese in mind.
The chances that this game will become a DnD game ist next to 0. You can see it yourself an the last Panel of Hell. Its more easy to make Larians Cheese getting approved by WotC instead of making a DnD game.
I believe reworking those encounters could be done by simply reducing the number of enemies per fight in most cases. There might just be a select view encounters that would require more effort to rebalance by actually replacing the type of enemy you're facing off.
Well of course it CAN BE DONE. What i wanted to say is that it surely wont be done.
reason:
1. Larian doesnt give shit on comunity
2. Game allready sold well
3. Review (steam) are good because many people play 2 hours and give a review.
4. Most of the people who bought its dont even knoe what Baldurs gate was and much less played it.
5. its alot easier to get Aproval from WotC and then saying we are DND than actualy trying to implement DnD
6. Too much rework will result in a Production delay and as we learned they are lacking Staff allready.
