From what I have gathered it took Wizards of the Coast some 4-5 decades to figure out that it might be a good idea to constrain the ridiculous nonlinearities of their retarded ruleset with bandaids like "bounded accuracy".
And some people here treat D&D rules like they were some godsent commandments L O L
I'm not following.
Would you play chess with checkers ru!es? Why would you play D&D 5e with another ruleset?
All people are trying to suggest is make the game more like 5e which it is based on, not because it's the greatest system ever.
That's not totally true.
I don't really care about this game to be a "true" 5e D&D game because there's the logo on the box... But I really think the game would be far more interresting and tactical with less Larianisation of D&D.
I’m not following this either. Why would you put a D&D logo and say it’s based on 5e if you weren’t going to implement the ruleset and use the D&D setting?
Asking for less Larianism is asking for a more faithful interpretation of 5e. I know you agree because I know from your posts you agree with most of the suggested changes.
I should repeat again. No one is asking for a perfect 1:1 translation of 5e. What most critics want is a system that is first grounded in 5e and then make modifications to fit a video game environment. Larian instead used DOS and then modified it to fit 5e.
