All you do is try to make me looks like idiot. You exactly person from my first comment, and keep confirm it. Why i have no idea what is good or bad design? Why its big deal, if it not, and explained why. Or my opinion not legit, because i don't know names of spells? I smart enought to imagine what a type of spells it can be, if it was described as "spells and attack which give advantages"
Overall as i said before, on this forum only 1 option. You agree with maintain idea that movement\height stuff\shove bad, or you casual\moron and your opinion not important. Because if you smart, you should be agreed with it, obvious.
No, you can absolutely make an argument for particular points, but like a few people have said it's not terribly fair to come in, claim that everyone else is wrong and that it's depressing to read their posts, and then say you don't really know what they're talking about. There's a few people here I pretty vehemently disagree with on things, but they're coming from a place of at least understanding the system and being able to explain why they feel the way they do, or believe particular points are wrong. I just don't think it's very fair to expect people to engage in a more meaningful way with your arguments when you won't at least read why people who disagree with you feel the way they do.
I don't think you're an idiot and I'm not aiming to make you look like one, as I said I agree with a good amount of the criticisms of low level 5e that you mentioned. I just think you should skim some of the stuff people have said before, or some of the rules behind 5e so that you can better understand why people feel the way they do, before you argue that they shouldn't feel that way. It's not fair to argue that the skills aren't made useless but then also refuse to read what the skills or spells in question even are.
