Originally Posted by Ixal
Originally Posted by Rack
Yeah I was going to point to Cyberpunk as an example of player-sexuality misfiring. Unless your character was bisexual you only ever had a single potential romantic partner, take it or leave it.

And that is fine. BG3 is not a dating simulator.
Not getting your preffered romance is much better than making every NPC bisexual/playersexual for romance while the rest of the character is written completely different (or having to write each NPC as bisexual in the first place).

That's a fair take but there are still people who do want this stuff. Whichever way you go you'll make someone unhappy.

As far as BG3 goes I think it would probably go better by leaning towards characters having a set sexuality. Given how appealing the character's aren't it's going to feel like a conga line rejecting 8 companions in a row when that first party happens.