This is a good start @Saberem, but you need more than 100 rolls to determine if there is actually a statistical difference between BG3 rolls and randomness. Your non-weighted results produce a Chi^2 of 20.8, and your weighted-results produce a Chi^2 of 24.8. Both of these are below the 95% confidence value of 30.14, and thus we can't conclude that either of these distributions is different than a totally random distribution.
When I add this to @DragonSnooz's weighted-dataset (608 total rolls), the dataset is still indistinguishable from an even distribution (Chi^2 of 16.2, less than the 95% confidence value of 30.14). There are only 2 values that differ from expectation at >3-sigma: 6 (18 rolls out of an expected 30, for a 5-sigma difference) and 17 (40 rolls when we expect 30, for a 3-sigma difference).
...which is a bit odd to me, tbh. This is the weighted-roll dataset, and thus it should be different than an even distribution. Maybe I'm doing the stats wrong?
@DragonSnooz, the "Normal Attack Rolls (Player)" data you posted earlier in this page was for weighted rolls, right?
