Yes, all the data in that post is for weighted rolls. If weighted dice only function to reduce streaks, then it should become an even distribution faster than Larian's true random.
Here is the chart from patch 3 (unweighted).Ah. I was of the mindset that weighted dice made it more likely to roll a middling number, not reduce streaks.
Thanks for the unweighted chart. It's Chi^2 is 23.5 which is still below the 95% confidence value of 30.14.
The most extreme values in that chart are 6 (4 times) and 17 (16 times):
The chance of rolling at least one number only 4 times is 3.5%.
The chance of rolling at least one number 16 times is 0.8%.
Neither of these are too incredibly unlikely.
BUT! If we combine your unweighted chart with @Saberem's unweighted data, we get a Chi^2 of 32.26 which is GREATER than the 95% confidence value of 31.14. Thus, we can conclude that Larian's unweighted dice rng is NOT random.
The most extreme values were 6 (7 times), with a ~1.8% chance of happening.
and 17 (rolled 28 times), with a ~0.02% chance of happening. This is pretty unlikely.
Math
