Originally Posted by Ixal
Originally Posted by GreatOdinsBeard
Originally Posted by Ixal
Originally Posted by Piff
BUT, us peasants were allowed to own knives. And there were many regulations regarding the difference between knives and swords, which was important because people would make very large knives that were still totally counting as knives and not as swords, to get around such arming laws. We were also allowed to own a variety of farming tools, some of which are basically blades on the ends of sticks anyway, so turning them into weapons was easy.

Fun fact, knives and farming implements were often better against nobles than swords, at least once plate mail became the norm for them.
But yes, swords were the weapon of the ruling class, thus received a much better PR than spears or axes, thus they became the "cool" weapon.

Lol...just no...

Arms and Armor—Common Misconceptions and Frequently Asked Questions

Nothing in that FAQ contradics anything I said. So... just yes...

Farming tools were not more deadly than actual weapons of war. A guy with a pitchfork was going to get demolished by an armored man-at-arms, even if that man-at-arms is in a full kit of chainmail rather than plate.

Swords were not only for the "ruling class", in some cities you couldn't openly carry a sword unless you were nobility, but in many cities not even nobility could opely carry one, as they were considered to be a 'weapon of war'. As I recall only Germany at one period outlawed the peasantry from owning swords, which is where the 'messer' originates. Swords were relatively common standard weapons in most armies up until the middle of the first world war. In medieval England (15th cebntury), a civilian could purchase a cheap sword for as little as 2 pence.


A fondness for power is implanted in most men, and it is natural to abuse it when acquired.
-Alexander Hamilton