It has been shown (
https://forums.larian.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=96760&Number=765262#Post765262) that Larian's unweighted dice produce non-uniform results. Notably, they produce an overabundance of 17s and underabundance of 6s.
Your 32 rolls alone aren't nearly enough to be a statistically valid sample (you'd need at least >300 rolls), but they do reinforce the frequent occurrences of 17.
Combined, yours+@DragonSnooz+@Saberem's 308 unweighted die rolls produce a chi-squared value of 36.15, which is greater than the critical value of 30.1, showing that the sample is not-consistent with uniformity with 95% confidence.
--17 appears 2x more often than it should, a 4-sigma difference
--1 appears 50% as often as it should, a 1.9-sigma difference
--6 appears 50% as often as it should, a 1.9-sigma difference
--The average is 11.5 (The standard deviation of a n=308 sample is 0.33, putting our average 3-sigma off)
Similarly, 747 weighted die rolls produce a chi-squared value of 14.7, extremely consistent with a uniform distribution.
--6 appears ~70% as often as it should, a 1.8-sigma difference
--The average is 10.7 (The standard deviation of a n=747 sample is 0.21, putting our average only 1-sigma off = within expected tolerance)
Notably, the weighted dice are not actually weighted. They produce a uniform distribution, so in fact it is NOT cheating to use them. It would be more accurate to say that using the unweighted dice is cheating, as you get a lot of 17s and infrequent 1s.
