Well Pathfinder is Pathfinder and not DnD.
Of curse Pathfinder includes a lot more options. Not even mentioning around 200 Options for Feats?
Some people like the extra complexity, but DnD has its own advantages. (Exspcially for non Combat Solutions)
(At least thats my opinion, since i played DnD 5, Pathfinder 1 and 2....Pathfinder has a way more complex Characterbuilder, but also depends on Combat for Gameplay... for DnD a Mystery is way easier to pull off for example, because you got a lot more options in that design category.)
But now: Back to Topic:
I don't think his point is to compare the systems directly, but to compare how close they are to implementing the source matherial compared to BG3.
BG3 at this point is missing many classes, reaces, most of the subclasses and feats of the PHB whereas WotR has implemented most, and both are in early access (WotR with 2 yrs development vs 4 yrs for BG3). What is implemented in BG3 does not work as in the books as well.
So I think is a fair comparison.
