Originally Posted by Maximuuus
Originally Posted by Pandemonica
The forums seem to be suffering from the same problem in politics of "its is my way, because my personal opinion is fact. Anyone that feels differently, are either idiots or some other insult insinuating they are either white knights or players that just want to fap to some romanceable character.

- Easy advantage leading to useless spells/abilities and decreasing the tactical value of the game = fact
- Eating pig head is better than healing potion = fact.
- Shove is OP compared to anything else = fact
- Party of 4 is less "AP/round" then 5 or 6 party member = fact.
- The resting system broke the concept of ressource management = fact
- BG3's Auto reactions >< D&D reactions = fact.
- Dipping Sword in a candle is not possible even in the reality of the FR = fact.
- Jumping to disengage reduce/delete the zone of control of melee ennemies = fact.
- ...

The most discussed threads here are based on facts.
Maybe a lot of people don't consider those facts as issues but... it's a personnal opinion.
I'd add lack of class features or class features that are implemented completely different from the PnP. A good example is Rogue not having expertise, everyone having Cunning Action and Thief being a different subclass entirely.

Why do we keep mentioning this? Because none of it has been addressed. I'm not saying that it should be changed, I'm not a dev, just addressed, talked about. If they are deliberately going in this D&D/DOS hybrid direction because they think it is better, please state it clearly so I can update my expectations.

Last edited by Danielbda; 10/04/21 03:24 PM.