Originally Posted by Pandemonica
Originally Posted by fylimar
That's true - and I want to add, that sometimes you have to repeat yourself, because something is important and you don#t want it to get drown in other. things like party size, some combat mechanica and such are recurring themes, which shows, that it is important to a lot of people.
And you can give criticism and still like the game.

No one is saying criticism is a bad thing. But their is a difference between constructive criticism and ranting. The issue is, when someone disagrees with the ranter and then is degraded and belittled.

And @dexai I would challenge you to find where I have EVER been combative, or dismissive in any post until I was attacked for my view, because God forbid I didn't agree with the "Larian is sh%t" narrative, "Copy Solasta", or you know, because I disagree about having a 5 or 6 party size. Then, when someone is called on that, they resort to the classic l"I do this out of love for the game" as if that justifies anything. But thanks for proving my point in your post above when I was not even engaging with you, and was just having a debate about the possible effects of continuous posting about the same subject and its possible effects on the populace.

You mean any post aside from the one I quoted above where you did exactly that? And now you put on the victim sweater, poor you were only "having a debate", yet all I did was direct your own words and opinions about other people here on the forums back at you, the pot calling the kettle black. You sure get mighty defensive for a pot that weren't bring combative or dismissive towards the kettle.

I understand your point about me not having been involved in the discussion before though, I disagree that that means I shouldn't respond to your public remarks though -- however I look forward to you applying that standard of yours to yourself in the future and not replying to any post or thread that doesn't directly mention or engage with you first.


Optimistically Apocalyptic