Well thank you for the info I will look into those threads..
I have finished this playthrough as I feel for EA after goblin camps feel like the natural end zone
So gonna do a quick summary of how feel about this game
It is very good I really quite like it
I would still like to see some changes tho
Party size and method of controlling party not a fan of the chain system and party size is gonna make it a tad too hard for new players A thought occurs that I've seen in other games when exp is gain the larger the party the less exp the party gets as a whole but I'll but my idea in that other thread.
More NPC I feel they're not enough options for a good party when it comes to rogue/thief or even a frontline fighter unless your main is gonna be your tank.
And as for the NPC hmmm I not keen on the vampire as I said he too much based on the kinda vampire diaries or twilight or interview with a vampire take on vampires and personally not a fan of this style I actually prefer the original take on BG2 where they just give an air of superiority and consider you beneath them attitudes but that just my feel I am sure there peeps who love him as a chr.
Shadowheart I am still undecided on, to be honest not a bad NPC and has some intrigue to here
Gale Meh like him for wizard support he adds but eating magic artifact that is useful to my party kinda sucks
warlock did not have him in a party yer so not really seen enough of him to decide but know about the devil inside aspect thanks to tadpole ability
Laz-zel Is pretty but how I imagine gith to be a bloodthirsty warrior with a straightforward attitude quite like this chr even tho she would not like my choices much kinda make me want to try it her style and to me, this is how you know you got a good NPC.
But after some talks with some NPC later seem there is the option to add a new NPC later like the devil for who I killed the paladins for.
Now for my main question does it deserve the name BG III...
Sigh No I not interested in arguing this it is not BG3 I a big fan of the Bioware games and I was happy with the ending in TOB while It would be nice to see some story element from the bhaal saga played out in this game it still does not make this BG3 it's its own game and as I said before that is fine but reason, why I say it not a successor, is a playstyle and feel I would have preferred Lariun to leave the name Baldurs Gate alone and have started a new franchise with there own name as I feel the potential for this game to become its own franchise name is here.
