Originally Posted by Sigi98
Originally Posted by teclis23
yeah the dialogue isnt the best. Also the NPCS are just weird eg they arent masculine enough.eg astarion and alot of the other npcs are running around like literally killing monsters and fighting demons but in the cut-scenes they dont appear to have a strong character. Its like they are a bunch of weak pansies in the cut-scenes and they act completely differently in the battles. For me it just deosnt make sense and i think the writing is garbage to be honest.

For example in a real life scenario you would have to be an incredibly strong and masculine person to kill demons and mind-flayers but in BG3 in the cut-scnenes they speak like a bunch of woke scared pansies who would go to an arts museum on the weekends to see an art piece by Leonardo davinci but if you look at history the people who have done heroic stuff like this are people like for example William Wallace from Scotland who (stood up too the British) and was a charismatic strong man who was a leader of men. The NPCS in BG3 are just nothing like this, they are a bunch of soft woke pansies who would suckle there mothers nipple at night.

Litterally.

It seems to me that the problem isn't the quality of the cut scences, but your interpretation of 'masculinity' and its questionable importance in the context of heroism and demon-killing.

Lol the wrting has to be realistic. The NPCS are just not real enough for me and the wrting is to woke,eg to politically correct.

Also the story isnt immersive ............at all............regardless of my other takes i am being genuine here