Would you like the game less if you couldn't eat pigs head as a bonus action ?
Is there something in the game that forces you to do this? If you don't think it makes sense then don't do it.
Would you like the game less if being higher gave you a +1 or +2 bonus rather than an advantage ?
That's not D&D 5E rules. The DM awarding advantage where they think it is appropriate is.
Would you like it less if disengage as a bonus action was not allowed for everyone ?
Love the disengage mechanic. Works great for a video game.
Many of us raised facts while many of you just raised nothing.
The problem is that many folks get their opinion confused with facts.
This a forum for arguing for our personal preferences but that's all they are: personal preferences.
- The uniqueness of classes is toned down because of the homebrew, that's a fact.
- Disengage as a bonus action have huge consequences on the AOO mechanic, that's a fact.
- Tons of spells and features are suboptimal choices because there are more optimal mechanics to have advantage/disadvantage, that's a fact.
- The game drives you to / reward you better if - you play with a limited number of mechanics, that's a fact.
- The game is balanced arround those mechanics, that's a fact.
- The reaction system doesn't work as intended in DnD. The system in BG3 doesn't give you a proper control, that's a fact.
- ...
I gave you facts.
Those facts limit our creativity, our choices, our tactical possibilities, the (tactical) depth of the game, the replay value of the game, the control we have over our characters, they create balance issues, and so on...
I'm glad for you if that suits your personnal preferences. It doesn't match with mine.
(Not to mention the disingenuous "it's not D&D 5e rules" but the "Love the disengage mechanic" or the "don't use it if you like it" that makes me think that you really don't understand the problem as a whole)
