The problem with "satire" is that it works only if your "humorous implication" has some merit and reflects reality.
Which is why your attempt falls flat on in its face.
"humorous implication" is matter of personal taste ...
I laughed ... that is humorous enough for me. :P
Also ... what attempts exactly? O_o
You are accusing the opposing faction of a behavior that is instead typical of your side of the barricade.
I dont feel that way ...
And even if, im not responcible for my barricade behaviour (even less, sice i didnt even know there was any barricade) ... only for my own. :P
And if you wish to lecture me about my behaviour, i strongly hope that you will lead by example.
Most of the criticism about what Larian changed is focused on the negative impact these decisions have on the flow of the combat.
Most of the defenses on the other hand are based on some variation of "I don't really understand the consequences/care about them, but I'm fine more or less with everything and I trust Larian with my life".
That is how you see it ...
In fact its usualy simple: "Im having fun with this change, therefore i like it."
I would bet significant sums that if Larian tomorrow published a community update along the line of "We were experimenting with ideas but they turned out horribly wrong, a complete disaster, so now we are reverting all of them" none of the usual suspects always in first line to defend these "custom rules" would stick to defend them.
Well ... if we look aside from the fact that Larian would need to throw away lot of work and resources just to "try something" ... and concidering it as purely hypotetical situation ...
If the result would be fun to play ... i dont see any reason to stand against it. O_o
That would be pretty mad.
Also, as others already explained there are entire class mechanics that break down when you change some rules of engagement, so "I don't really understand what's the problem with this change" can be excused as honest ignorance at first, but when you keep ignoring any argument that goes into the details of why something doesn't work only to repeat the same thing it becomes nothing less than disingenuous.
If by "any" you mean one ... that was told just now ...
Even then, no ... as you can see, i didnt ignore it ... but how would you argue about something that is not even there?
People were complainging here about that Larian will ruin Necromancers ...
I must say that i envy their oracle potential, but sadly i dont see the future ... so i cant say anything about how will Larian deal with Necromancers, nor Barbarians, nor how they will implement evade for Rogues ...
We can talk about what IS in game, and im all in for such debate ...
But speculations are pointless.
