Originally Posted by Pandemonica
Originally Posted by Saito Hikari
Okay, time to re-rail this because certain people insist on continuing this train of thought and proving me right.
Wow, I have never seen anyone so desperate to have the last word. But if it makes you feel better that your somehow being proven right, that is fine.

Originally Posted by Saito Hikari
Solasta's OP feats are a bit forgivable considering they are literally forced to homebrew that stuff. But I don't think there was anything forcing Larian to implement the questionable cheese mechanics in BG3.

So for some reason, now what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander. It is kind of hypocritical to say that homebrew in Solasta is ok, but not in BG3 (just because you personally like the homebrew of Solasta). As a former "mod" for a gaming forum, you should be familiar with being able to remove your personal preference, and judge both by the same principle.
Other forum members are allowed to have opinions that disagree with you. And in no way does anyone have to be all for homebrew or all against homebrew. Homebrew is situational and it's very normal to like homebrew X, but not homebrew Y.

Could you please not make personal accusations and focus on the discussion of the thread?

Originally Posted by Pandemonica
The irony of this is that if you go to the Solasta forums, where people try the reverse and try to start hate on BG3... the majority want and enjoy both games. The overall opinion is the more D&D the better, and they look forward to the differences (where here, they want a replica). Of course people have justifiable discussions about little things like inventory management, the ugly group chain, the UI but none of this Larian bashing or these "mechanic sux" attitude. It is actually a pretty interesting comparison between communities.
Nice to know that more people agree that Baldur's Gate 3 would be better if it became more D&D rules-as-written.