Overall I enjoyed all the games in the DA series. DA2 is definitely "the worst," in that it is very poorly made. I also think it's the most unique and interesting game in the series but unfortunately it didn't get the development time it deserved and ended up being very bad overall.
It allways seemed to me like if someone in BioWare had a vision ...
And really wanted to give it a try ... but the studio was not quite sure if that would work ... so they created low budget "test subject" ... and that is what we know as Dragon Age II.
Honestly im quite sad that Inquisition did not return closer to its roots ...
Especialy in character development, and combat matter ... those things seem to be upgraded (thanks god for at least that tho) DA 2.
Origins especially, since the goals this game has set for itself are very similar to the goals of Bg3.
DAI has a weak story. It's so weak. Cut into DLC. With an extremely weak villain who was taken from DLC (AGAIN!) DA2. How can this be a good example? Never constructing story like that.
I really hope that Larian won't do this.
I dared to cut Abits' quote a little, so the difference is more obvious. :P
And im for one with him in this ...
Origins have incredible story (even tho i believe it could be still improved), incredible characters (with one that is incredibly inconsistent with the rest of the universe
... yes, i mean un-horned Sten), and beautifly detailed world. :3
And those are things, Larian SHOULD do ... and so far, it seem to me like they are doing them pretty well.
