Originally Posted by Wormerine
Originally Posted by Blackheifer
I love that Baldur's gate 3 in multiplayer gives everyone such an incredible range of actions both helpful and harmful to the party.
And that is kind of experience I find no joy in, but that made D:OS2 popular I guess. And is so, not an RPG or Baldurs Gate experience.

I will be an old man and say: twitch damaged gaming.
There is nothing wrong playing alone.
There are also those who play with other people, but also run another game as alone since in multiplayer cooperative it can be sometimes hard to agree on when to play. I belong to those people that will play BG3 with both other people and alone (except companions so not so alone feeling).

I do not understand when you say that BG3 is not roleplay??? How would Solasta be more roleplay then BG3?

I really do not care how other people want to play. Yes some multiplayer might play like use much roleplay and some might never play like roleplay and simple have fun then let them.

You can play alone if you want nothing wrong in it. However I do understand when you think BG3 is not RPG and Solasta is?
You can run Solasta and like never care much for any roleplay simple fast click and do not care to read any discussion. How much people use roleplay is up to them. Nothing wrong playing without RPG. Nothing wrong playing with RPG.

If you mean that like an old player you personally like to see old kind of graphics? If that is the issue well then I guess play games that look less good as DOS2 or BG3. However please do not claim that BG3 is not a roleplay game.

Last edited by Terminator2020; 03/08/21 01:54 PM.