I am not taking a shot at the developers of Solasta. I wish them the best for the great product they passionately created. I was just pointing out that you were calling someone wrong/dishonest while being utterly dishonest. Solasta did make a solid enough game, that is sometimes more conservative in its adaptation than BG3 in its current state (which is not even halfway in its EA, but that's another question). They did not adapted the 5E Players Handbook perfectly, which they dont owe the rights to, as a small indi studio. Their game is very limited in the terms of roleplay, which is fine, it is more of a dungeon crawl anyway and when it comes to the storytelling, they are not even playing in the same league with BG3, which is again fine and understandable.
Wow, in your post you simply curse me whilst avoiding the core argument that I put.
What you say is nonsensical given that Solasta's dev don't have the money to buy the complete license to 5E. They've implemented 5E in the way of gameplay, the video game plays as the tabletop would, this is what I mean though it should be obvious.
Larian stated that this transition from tabletop to video game could not be done, but Solasta did it. Since I refuse to believe they were not capable of the implementation, this seems like dishonesty to me, in that they didn't want to implement the ruleset faithfully, but that is not what was said.
Please, we don't need to carry on with this, you already cursed me for no reason.
