Originally Posted by Terminator2020
I am not complaining about Pathfinder 2 replay value other then that you can not play it multiplayer. I know you can wven become Lich or Angel believe at least Lich. About Bg3 replayability is difficult from Act 1 alone and Alpha with not all base classes released.
Multiplayer is not a feature I care about at all. In fact Bg3 would have been much better without it.

Originally Posted by Avallonkao
BG3 has no sort of management system, Kingdom management on PF1, and now Crusader on PF 2. For this reason alone BG3 already is better for me. Not that I won't play WOTR, it's just that having those mechanics are boring and I hate it and always will.
It's literally optional in wrath. You can go to the options and cancel it if you want.


Larian's Biggest Oversight, what to do about it, and My personal review of BG3 EA
"74.85% of you stood with the Tieflings, and 25.15% of you sided with Minthara. Good outweighs evil, it seems."