I mean if you are choosing to interpret this discussion as a very personal thing to the point that you are willing to deprive yourself of something you know you’d otherwise enjoy because of… Vague principles?

I mean, if you think people here advocating for the game are trying to stick it to anyone else here, then I will just be blunt, you have to realize that you are definitely trying to do that yourself in the other direction too. And the way you’re going about this cannot really be interpreted any other way. That’s not really the fault of anyone else here, and I wouldn’t try acting high and mighty about it.

Like this wasn’t some one sided thing either, unless you literally missed that entire discussion a few pages back about how the Pathfinder games very poorly interpret some aspects of the rule set to the point where it results in enemies having stat bloat to the level where BG3’s issues with that concept look nonexistent.

You’ve gone and lambasted someone for passing judgement on you, as someone we don’t know. But you’ve passed judgment on the people in this thread, so I think they know enough and are well within their rights to do the same to you. If you truly believed your words, you wouldn’t be posting in here in the hopes that people would convince you otherwise, or you’re really just here to stir up some drama yourself. Which is it, really?

I feel with the advent of the internet, the world has been losing its grip on the concept of pragmatism.

Last edited by Saito Hikari; 31/08/21 06:20 PM.