I guess it comes down to one's expectations. Since I never had an expectation that the game would be bug-free or problem-free at launch, and also no expectation that I was going to be playing the game for at least 3 months from launch, I am not disappointed or upset or angry.
@Abits, I don't think it's about Owlcat (or most developers; there may be exceptions) abusing people or being dishonest. I just don't think anyone can make a game as complex and huge as WotR and have it NOT have a bunch of problems at launch. Even if Owlcat took another ten years on the game before launching it, there would be problems, because the devs themselves will not be in a position to catch some of these bugs and it takes thousands of people playing the game for these issues to show themselves. Also, I don't think you are foolish at all. Having been hopeful and then being disappointed are both eminently reasonable, but it does not make you foolish for having been hopeful.
Buddy We can get a little more specific and talk about some examples. I think mostly about the mount system and crusader system, both were implemented pretty late as part of Kickstarter campaign, and both just feel like they are not finished. It might be a little outrageous of me, but I think that of they gave them so much trouble they don't worth the investment and this is a time better spent on polishing other aspects of the game, and perhaps can be later implemented as dlcs or something. I just don't find it fair to claim your game features mounted combat if it barely works. And a final note about support - after all I still finished the game and enjoyed it immensely so I don't think me criticising owlcat's release policies gonna have any implications about how much I'm gonna support them in the future. I just wanted to mention I don't think they do certain things in the way I would have expected and I don't like it, but can't say it completely ruined my experience. I'll probably pre order their next game as well, even if I'm not gonna play it right away.
