So... let me see if I'm understanding you correctly.
In your opinion, players should have to get together and discuss at length the basic storyline details of a video game? In order to fully understand the story, even the most minor story elements of it, they need to discover the truth together through discussion?
This is a video game. I should be able to understand what is ACTUALLY happening in the story by myself. I shouldn't need to go out and discuss it in a committee to learn the actual truth of what is happening in the game especially about minor story points. The story should be built in such a way that while I'm playing it, I learn the actual plot of the story; not some ambiguous relative potential story that is based on my own personal perception versus yours. Again, the fact that you are even saying that it's all my perspective versus yours tells me that the story details are too ambiguous.
I'm suggesting that Larian needs to hone in the details more for the story. Are you disagreeing with this? Shouldn't a player be able to play the game for the first time and basically give me the main timeline of events of the story and have it roughly align with my own because there is a clear story taking place? Should Player 1 get an entirely different idea of what is happening than Player 2? Seriously? Is that what you're telling me?
