For this comment, I'm going to respond by giving you a taste of how you treat me. I'm not ACTUALLY being mean or nasty to you. Quite the opposite, I would really like to have decent, friendly conversations with you. That's the only reason I'm taking the time to do this.
I just want you to see how you come across. So, if I offend you, it is only because I am reflecting your style of responses back at you, or at least the way I perceive your responses.
This was here allready few times wasnt it? O_o
Logically, it only makes sense that if I'm repeating myself, it is only because I must not be getting through to some people. o_o
I would not mind Halsin gets some buff ...
Finally, we agree on something. :P
i believe that level 15 is kinda too much ... but give him one or two, would make drastical difference between him and our characters, especialy if we will indeed be caped for level 4 for whole Act 1. (As it seems after last PfH) :-/(Wich i still believe is HORRIBLE idea)
And then you ruined it. o_o Almost I gave you a +1, but you decided to become completely illogical there. It is obvious that it ruins the game completely to have Halsin at Level 5 or even lower. Why? Because he is a First Druid and an Accomplished Healer, obviously. :P What more needs to be said? Case closed. Larian should just buff Halsin and be done with it. Then, problem solved. After all, it only makes logical sense that if people are making him out to be some tough druid who is a powerful healer, he should actually be a powerful healer. Right? I mean, it's kind of a duh. o_o
On the other hand we dont know how many other problems it would make in the future, since we really do not know the futher story. :-/
Yes! You are absolutely right. "we dont know" meaning both you and me both do not know the future and what problems it could bring. So why not make a suggestion based on the data we DO have and let Larian decide what they will ACTUALLY implement. :-/
I mean, after all, if neither of us knows the future, why not let people make suggestions about what they'd like to see, and trust that Larian will make the right decisions for the game. You aren't the Baldur's Gate 3 Champion Defender of the game who knows what is to come and can therefore determine what is the right or wrong choice to make for implementation of various game design elements. So, since you aren't that, why do you shoot down everyone else's suggestions since you don't know the future either and you don't know their budget and you don't know their plans, so let me flip this and say, "Maybe it would work better for the future for Halsin to BE buff." You don't know.
And im not talking here about Goblin leaders, wich would also make some troubles.
Why not talk about them here? Are you afraid your concept of the game might get shattered again by reason and logic. :-/ Why not buff the goblin leaders too. That would make more sense, especially when the game is finally released and we might be at Level 5 or even higher by the time we face them, depending on our choices in the game. o_o
But about story beyond Act 1 ... since as i stated countless times i believe that will be time when we start recruiting non-tadpoled followers, and once Halsin would be 3times as powerfull as our characters he would automaticly and logicaly be impossible to recruit. And that would be shame.
Does it matter that you stated it countless times? I also state things countless times but you ignore it too.
As I also stated countless times, either Larian should make Halsin not recruitable or they should debuff him and give a reason for it. Then, problem solved. There, now it makes sense he's apart of the party and traveling with you. He was Level Drained. :-/
Looking at this topic, i can only say that *IF* i was from Larian and read it, i would be like:
Sometimes levels have to step aside for story, and this is the case ... deal with it.
So ... sory, but -1 from me.
Well, if I was Larian I'd totally disregard everything you have to say because anyone who is a regular fan of cRPGs would say that the emphasis should always be on making story and mechanics align. It is totally immersion breaking when you are playing a game and you are supposed to be fighting a super powerful enemy only to find out that they are not super powerful at all. It was all overrated. How many memes do you see online about how you fight a super powerful boss person, defeat them, and then they join you only to become as weak as a turd?
This makes people unhappy.
So, for a cRPG to be truly awesome, story and mechanics need to align. That's what makes the most logical sense. :o
So, *IF* I was from Larian and read your responses, I would be like:
If you want a trash cRPG, then sure, don't bother to align the story with the mechanics. Just keep the two elements separate and see what the majority of players say. This is smart, so deal with it.
So... in reverse... sorry, but
-1 from me to you. :P
Do you see how this is seriously offensive to someone? Just because you put your emojis after everything you say, that doesn't make it nice. It makes it sarcastic and even nastier.
So, can we just stop it? Huh? Can we? Please? I'd really like to have pleasant BG3 conversations. You can disagree with me. Lots of people disagree with me. You can even tell me why. Many times, people change my mind when they tell me why about a suggestion I have. Just stop with the indirect insults, for Heaven's Sake. I don't insult you or disrespect you. So, why are you doing so to me?
