🤣. Look at you, trying to bait me again. 🤣
I never claimed i will not. :P
Wow! People are actually wondering? Has anyone told you they were wondering?
Few people asked, yes.
Why would i say it otherwise?
I'm just not letting you bait me into a senseless pissing match.
Reeeaaaly.
So ... *this* was some kind of sencefull ontopic post, or w/e would be oposite to senceless pissing match? O_o
I mean, you claim that you want "pleasant BG3 conversations" aswell as you "don't insult you or disrespect me" ... was this example of any of that? :-/
Seriously, continue this crap and I'll just ignore you for good. Your choice.
I must say that i feel the urge to write: "Challenge accepted" ...
As i said before, i was wondering how long will you stand for your own word.
But again, same as before, since you refuse to tell me what "this crap" is, its quite logical to presume i would continue it.
You know this reminds me arguing with mad partner ...
When you ask her what is wrong ... she tells you "nothing" ... and then she gets mad that you did not find out what was wrong.
It would be fine to read other people thoughts (sometimes) but i dont do that yet.
And people are wondering why i cant take you seriously ...
Considering the amount of effort you spent typing up all your arguments in this thread so far, it seems you take GM4Him's opinion pretty seriously, RagnarokCzD.
Touché.
Some could argue that there is difference between autor and topic itself, but yeah i can see where you get that expression from.
Let me rephrase it:
I cant take your promises seriously.
I hope that is better.
It's clear after the first page of the thread that you're not convincing anyone, and no one can convince you either.
Is it tho?
I mean at least 95% of this whole threat is just me and GM4Him, with occasional reaction from few people on some general stuff (title i would guess, since they didnt adress anything specific we were talking about) ... or on us as users, instead of topic (so just personal attack of opourtunity i gues ... and yes, i count there your post aswell) ... so what exactly in this case "convincing anyone" mean anyway? O_o
So one has to wonder what the real point of your insisting on bashing GM4Him's opinion is.
Since i do not do that ...
The only thing i can promise is that i will tell you when (or rather even if i ever) start.
But if you are asking what is real point of me writing here ... i gladly tell you (again, since i allready did in this very topic):
I see GM4Him's theories, i like to read them, and concider them ...
Then i see holes and missinterpretations there ...
I examine those holes and point out things i seen / heared / read in game ... expecting anyone who is as interested in GM4Him's theories as i am (yes, including him), to reconcider them and help us both to find where is the stumbling-block.
And why?
Well, as far as i understand it, the very reason for this topic existence was (
not to explore my relationship with GM4Him, but) to point out plotholes ...
And since his own theories have plotholes ... im pointing them out, with offering alternative explanations, details that might be oversight, or missinterpreted that will fix them ...
If you ask what i expected (also allready said that)...
It was the same what i offered.
<A> Sazza was in party that was hunting Aradin.
<B> No, no she was in prison when Aradin arived.
<A/C> But she was talking about some looters in Goblin camp, wasnt that aradin?
<A/B/C> Yes, it could be him ... but since she was in prison when he was in camp, it have to be someone else.
That kind of stuff ...
Instead i get (obviously sarcastic):
"Oh my gosh! You're right! I'm a moron and I didn't notice all that," (actual quote) What else are you trying to prove, other than you have a different opinion than the others here? That your point of view is somehow "correct"? Superior?
But im not stating any opinion ... you did not read the whole topic, did you? :-/
I simply repeat (quote if you like) things that ARE in game ... sometimes i offer my own explanation for them, or my own connection of dots if you like ...
And as i stated multiple times (and not just here) im all in if someone can show me litteraly anything that actualy is INGAME, wich will proove me wrong.
I would even welcome it, bcs that would mean that at least one person on this forum is capable of ACTUAL dialogue on topic. :-/
Timebean was one light in the darkness, or first swallow as we say in czech ... since s/he (sorry, dunno) actualy reacted on something that was said in here, and i would really not mind at all if s/he would be totally against me ... as long as his argument would be "here you have" isntead of "i think".
Would it upset you that much if you simply move on and let other people who have the same opinion discuss and have their fun?
Well, personaly i believe that suround myself only by people of same opinion is for one act of weakness, and for two huge reason for degradation ... both in mental and social part of human being. :-/
So ... yeah, i gues it would, if you put it this way ... even tho this question seem to be constructed purposely.
Anyway i never forced anyone to talk with me (nor i even have any tools for that) ... i would apreciate it, sure, that is why i write theese things ... but the same question could be asked other way around ...
Or even better:
Would it upset you that much if you simply move on and let other people who actualy wants to talk about this topic discuss it and have their fun, instead of analyzing them and their relationships?
