Logically, it only makes sense that if I'm repeating myself, it is only because I must not be getting through to some people. o_o
Depends on point of view ...
I would say that "logical" move would be to search for those previous topics, and continue there.

I believe there is something even in forum rules about creating duplicite topics?
But i gues as long moderators are fine with it, it might be concidered acceptable.
Finally, we agree on something. :P
We allready did in the past, several times actualy.

So ... yay, "finally" once again ... i gues.

It is obvious that it ruins the game completely to have Halsin at Level 5 or even lower.
For you, maybe ... certainly not to me.
And concidering how huge support your previous posts about this topic get (none) ... i believe you are minority here. :-/
Larian should just buff Halsin and be done with it.
Bcs you said so?
In that case, i would recomend to start saving ... buy Larian will probably not come cheap.
After all, it only makes logical sense that if people are making him out to be some tough druid who is a powerful healer, he should actually be a powerful healer. Right? I mean, it's kind of a duh. o_o
Depends on definition ...
In some point of view he allready is powerful healer (through whole EA he is the only one who at least offers you possible solution to your problem, he is able to examine your health by few second magic examination [something even Ethel was unable to do], compared to all other druids he IS stronger than any of them, and finaly no Druid on level 5 have 95 HP [i mean ... Hill Dwarf, with Tough feat, with 20 CON have 68 ... acording to:
https://5ehpcalculator.com/ ... so, yeah, he obviously IS stronger] ... can you counter that?

) ...
The problem here is that he is simply not as powerful as YOU want.

Yes! You are absolutely right. "we dont know" meaning both you and me both do not know the future and what problems it could bring.
I know i am.

This might come as surprise, but that fact is one of reasons i wrote that.

So why not make a suggestion based on the data we DO have and let Larian decide what they will ACTUALLY implement. :-/
Gladly ...
Data i have say that Halsin is Level 5 bcs Larian wants him to be Level 5 ... and i do believe they have reason for that decision.
What say yours?

And please stick to things we actualy "DO have" as you demanded, instead of usual "obviously it should be as i say".

why not let people make suggestions about what they'd like to see, and trust that Larian will make the right decisions for the game.
As far as i know i never even tryed to prevent someone from giving a suggestion ... on the contrary for some others, who would like to prevent me from writing anything.
As i allways say ... im all in for free will.

Im just using my own right to comment on that proposal, nothing more.

In this particular case i even believe that Larian already did make the right decision for the game.

You aren't the Baldur's Gate 3 Champion Defender of the game who knows what is to come and can therefore determine what is the right or wrong choice to make for implementation of various game design elements.
I never claimed any of that ...
So ... im not quite sure why even mention that, its like to say that im not King of the Seven Seas ... or Ruler of the Omicron Persey 8 ... absolutely true, but completely irellevant (and kinda offtopic).
Its a nice title tho, maybe i keep it for some session ... Ragnarok Champion Defender ... sounds good.

I have to ask ... where did that plural go?
Just few words back it was "we do not know" and "netiher of us" ... and sudetly it changed to "you cannot determine".
Should that mean that you can?
What is your title?

(
Champion Defender is allready taken!)
So, since you aren't that, why do you shoot down everyone else's suggestions
I do not ... just those i concider bad.

As every responcible adult person participating in Early Acess Feedback should, in my opinion, since AFAIK that is main reason for existence of this forum.
so let me flip this and say, "Maybe it would work better for the future for Halsin to BE buff." You don't know.

I still can presume, its called common sence.

Usualy if you need some character to be strong, you dont start with making them weak. (and other way around)
I mean they could theoreticaly make Halsin weak at first and realize they would need him stronger later ... but i kinda doubt that they were waiting for us to tell them.

And im not talking here about Goblin leaders, wich would also make some troubles.
Why not talk about them here? Are you afraid your concept of the game might get shattered again by reason and logic. :-/
For one, this topic is about Halsin ...
For two, we allready talked about them in that previous topic you created.
For three, if you want to know you can read those reasons in that older topic.
And finaly i dont see much reason to spend time with listing you (again) the same things as last time (when you also didnt accpet them) since you will say you dont want to talk about it anyway, as you did in every other topic when, to use your own words: "your concept of the game might get shattered again by reason and logic".

Why not buff the goblin leaders too.
Funny you mention it ...
If i concider how much you were against last buffing Githyanki Patrol ... and claiming how impossibly hard fight that is ...
Now you want to do the same with another fight.
Curiouser and curiouser.
*
AliceAll my reasons are also written in one of those older topics, feel free to search for them.

But lets take one example:
I know you were suggesting that some NPCs will join our party to weight out differences in our strenght ... i dont like that suggestion, since i want to play game where my party will be in center of events, not just some bunch of random guys who are hiding behind big strong NPC and tickling some big strong Boss, so there is more obvious difference between our power.
I DO-NOT-LIKE-THAT-CONCEPT ... simple as that.

Its like eagles in Lord of the Rings ... theoreticaly they could fly with Frodo to the mountain (or as close as possible), but the book would suck.

That would make more sense, especially when the game is finally released and we might be at Level 5 or even higher by the time we face them, depending on our choices in the game. o_o
Ever heard about 5/5 = 50/50 = 5000/5000 = ... ?
Its the same concept here.
If you make one character stronger ... and then you need to buff everyone else to weight it out, you might aswell keep him as he is, and nothing will change.
Also, im not quite sure that we actualy "might be at level 5 or even higher by the time we face them" ...
On the contrary actualy, especialy since last Pannel from Hells, when Swen specificly said to us that they "didnt decided yet if they will make level 5 part of Act 1" ...
not Early Acess, ACT 1!!! ...
That sentence have two explanation ...
- Either Swen expressed himself really poorly.
(Or i understanded him wrong ... since English is not quite my cup of beer ... but concidering this forum im not the only one who understand those words like this so ... well, its one possibility)
- Or they actualy plan to give level cap to every Act so they can easily predict our power for certain encounters.
Does it matter that you stated it countless times? I also state things countless times but you ignore it too.

Oh i never ignore, i disagree but there is difference.

Disagreeing is taking your statement and by arguments and logical conclusion explain why you find it false.
Ignoring is stating "i dont want to talk about this anymore" and leave conversation.
I would expect you to understand this concept.
As I also stated countless times, either Larian should make Halsin not recruitable or they should debuff him and give a reason for it. Then, problem solved. There, now it makes sense he's apart of the party and traveling with you. He was Level Drained. :-/
Or they can simply ignore this topic (just as they did those previous) and keep him as he is.
I mean, you are your own enemy here.
The only reason for Larian to create some reason for halsin "level drain" you sugest ...
Would be to give Halsin "level boost" also you suggest ...
So, if they dont boost him ... there is nothing requiring drain ... everyone (except you apearantly) is happy. O_o
Well, if I was Larian I'd totally disregard everything you have to say because anyone who is a regular fan of cRPGs would say that the emphasis should always be on making story and mechanics align. It is totally immersion breaking when you are playing a game and you are supposed to be fighting a super powerful enemy only to find out that they are not super powerful at all.
If i remember corectly, i was Tuco (sory if i misstake you for someone else), who demanded that level of NPC should be invisible.
I believe his arguments could be sumarized as:
- level is "out of character" concept and therefore its immersion breaking
The funny part about this is, if he succeed, this topic would never exist ... since you would have litteraly no idea what level Halsin is.

But you are too focused on "just some number floating around his head" and you claim that you are acting in the name of immersion ... well, immerse this: Your character do not see that number.

:P
How many memes do you see online about how you fight a super powerful boss person, defeat them, and then they join you only to become as weak as a turd?

This makes people unhappy.
Agreed. (See? It happened again

)
But this sounds to me like argument for keeping his strength intact.

NPC Halsin strong > Recruitable Halsin weak -> meme material => people unhappy.
NPC Halsin *not as strong as GM4Him wants him* = Recruitable Halsin -> not meme material => people happy (except GM4Him as it seems).

So... in reverse... sorry, but -1 from me to you. :P
Well, people do not like being criticised ... i hope this was not suppose to be surprise.

Do you see how this is seriously offensive to someone?
No. O_o
Not at all.
Just because you put your emojis after everything you say, that doesn't make it nice. It makes it sarcastic and even nastier.
Well, i am often sarcastic ... and since i use emojis to fill my text with tone in wich it was said ... that means my emojis are working.

(Yes, just like right here.)
So, can we just stop it? Huh? Can we? Please?
Well, im affraid not ...
Certainly not until you tell me what *it* is.
IYou can disagree with me.
You can even tell me why.
Just stop with the indirect insults, for Heaven's Sake.
I don't insult you or disrespect you.
So, why are you doing so to me?
I decided to merge this quote since my reactions will be short ... every sentence new line:
I do.
I did.
I do not.
You do, but i dont mind.
I do not.
Looking forward for our single-reply conversation in next topic.

(Yes i was sarcastic again

)