Nowhere did i say that you were wrong. And ofc i accept the decision larian made (not that i have a choice).

Decisions can be changed though, that is why i wrote this. The risk that you state is exactly what i think a little more content might lessen. You tell me what problems we would have without an EA and that is exactly my point. Later game mechanics might show problems that could have been avoided like those you mentioned.

I would be lying if part of the reason would not be to get more content faster. I guess just adding more races and classes and allow for higher levels would help too. I am not sure if playing those in the current setting would not pose its own problems. That again would help too. Especially for players who tend to draw out moving on

in the story. If after release you stay in act one till level 6, 8, or even higher if XP allow for it, that might open up another list of problems. At least those can be avoided without continuing the storyline.


For some this might just sound like begging for more content, but that is not my intention. Not my only one at least, there will be time to play after release ofc. I hope that i will still like it then and not get this "not again" feeling and rush through act 1, miss out on stuff etc. Thats my personal issue.

My first AD&D game was pools of radiance. From 1988. On C64. And since then i have seen so many games i looked forward to fail miserably. A lot of D&D games were sub-par. Dark Alliance on PS4/5 is just another example that came out less then expected. It has been quite a while since i was so hyped for a game.

That's why i wrote my opinion. It has happened before. Often.

Last edited by UnknownEvil; 25/10/21 06:33 PM.