Again you are misunderstanding what I wrote. When I mentioned stories, I said oral stories. You are not going to find them in writing. As I said these are things I have heard historians say. Just like you, I have also read plenty of vampire lore but what you and I have read could be different. That's why you and I keep contradicting each other. I also want to remind you the I did not intend this thread to be a debate but to discuss why we like or do not like each companion, although you seem to have responded to my comments in a very argumentative way. You are also the person that responded to me previously by saying not to ask you why you don't like Astarion before you edited that part out of your response.
Nope, I understand perfectly, I just don't agree - two different things. ANd you were the one, wanting discussions here (see your answer to me on page 1). But I'm done here, this isn't leading anywhere.
The issue I see here is you don’t like my responses and are extremely dismissive which is why I see it as you being argumentative. Yes, this is a discussion but your response to me when I asked you about not seeing something or someone that is important as interesting was defensive where you accused me of insisting you like Astarion and before you edited it, you wrote “do not ask me again”. It stops being a discussion when the tone in your writing sounds defensive and argumentative.
As I said, we have different opinions and I don't think, I was argumentative. I have a different opinion from yours and we clearly don't see eye to eye. If you feel offended by that, sorry. I was just trying to have a discussion. But anyway, that's it for me, I really don't want to go on and on about who said what in which tone. Let's jus tagree to disagree and leave it at that, ok?
Yes, we can agree to disagree but once again, please, watch how you write online. There is no reason for “ok?” at the end of that sentence. It comes off as being forceful like giving someone an attitude.
