The main issue with that quote, Avyana, is the word "fun". Fun is subjective. And Larian asked us for feedback so all of us will give them our own idea of fun. And that will contradict sometimes with other people's ideas. I've also noticed that you and Ragnarok often use the diplomatic way, asking for an option. For this, I ask you, where goes the line for too many options? When will the game stop being a game designed with the intent of the developer and start being a mod kit that leaves the design to the players instead?
I personally, paid 60$ for a game, not a mod kit. And through the EA I will keep advocating for the things that I would like to stay as they are, the changes that I want to see, and stuff getting removed that I don't like.
I'm fully aware that not all my feedback will be listened to or agreed with, and even less actually be acted upon in the development. The end product WILL HAVE CONTENT that I personally don't like. But until the release day comes, I will try, through feedback, to make that a minimum. And so will every single person on these forums.
You and everyone else are more than free and welcome to give suggestions for how they imagine the perfect game. But never expect that there will be no objections. When your path is always optional, does your journey ever have an end?
I'm not sure how you see Ragnarok and me being diplomatic when refering to BG3, unless you are referring to people wanting more 5e rules. As for asking for ONE option in a game, I don't see this as a big deal. Of course, I expect objections for a comment that I make. I'm sure it's the same for you.
You said you paid $60 for the game, so did I. I have as much reason to give my feedback the same as you. What you want is no more important than what I want. It should be treated equally. Like you said, which I agree, the end content will either have things we like and don't like.
