Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Originally Posted by PrivateRaccoon
is like saying we can stop giving feedback all together and should just let Larian do their thing.
That is not true ...

DM asked our opinions ... we told him ... work is done, we could end there.
Instead, we start to argue to each other to find out whos opinion is better. :-/
(That is the debate i was talking about BTW)

I mean i agree ... DM should be able to take feedback, but people should aswell be able to take his decisions ... there need to be ballance, that is what im saying. :-/

If you read this topic thoroughly, almost half posts says basicaly "everything is wrong and i know better" ... that dont seem ballanced to me, that seems demanding. laugh

I do agree that the arguments around here can often get more intense than they need to be, but honestly, part of that is, I think, on Larian themselves. We have no way of knowing what decision they've made until we see it implemented in a patch. We can infer, but don't actually know, what decisions they've already made that they won't or can't change at all. So to a degree we don't have a choice but to get bogged down in arguments. The only way we know how to communicate with Larian is to post on these forums and make our cases for the changes we want. So one person makes their case. Another person makes the opposite case. Now the first person feels they have to defend their case because what if Larian takes not doing so as agreement that the other person's case is better. And a whole bunch of people come to back up the various cases being made because they have to prove that they support their idea, so Larian sees that the idea has lots of support. To a degree I can understand Larian's general silence, they don't want to box themselves in. But I still feel like the approach they've taken can't help but exacerbate this sort of arguing. Though I won't go so far as to say they caused it. This is an internet forum about a video game, of course arguments would inevitably occur.