Not even close. Wrath is a completely immersive DND (or Pathfinder, to be specific) experience and DOS3 (oh yeah, BG3) is a flashy cartoon in comparison. I have about the same hours of playtime in both games. Larian never should have called this game Baldur's Gate. My daughter, a huge gamer, laughs at me when she sees I have BG3 booted up because she says I paid to beta test a game. She is right.
Yeah, thats exactly what u did. And Larian especially warned you, and people like you who expect a done product, not to buy into early access...
early access or not.. i believe larian shown a big chunk of game in first act. i would expect nothing major will change visually, aesthetically or art design direction. it probably more of less the same but expanded chapters, higher level cap and obviously more classes upon release. at it's core it will still be a d&d game but i don't get any feeling of it being baldur's gate at all. it's really like a DOS2 dnd5e. i'll probably still spend alot of time in bg3 due to it being d&d. however, larian screw up the whole thing. at least for me. i'm hopeful that there will be major changes.. but i know that's a fool's hope.
@OneManArmy on topic.. i'm now on 2nd playthrough trickster hard difficulty. for me personally, angel is most heroic and glorious for me. but i had hope some stuff in trickster would be appeared in angel but i can understand they have to give something unique for each path. i'm not sure how lich will end though.
