Originally Posted by mrfuji3
DA2 companions were playersexual and in that game you still couldn't romance Varric. But yeah with DAI they went all in with the "this character has particular gender- and race-preferences", which helps them to sidestep any potential problem elements. Though 3 consecutive games where there's no dwarven npc with a romance scene is clearly a intentional decision on Bioware's part...

Hmm... Seems like you're correct! :] DA:O only had male/female limitations for some companions. DA:I had certain limitations (Solas and Cullen), but other than that they were mostly gender-specific yet again. :] I didn't play DA2 (and may or may not have completely forgotten about it's existence... :| Sorry) so dare not comment on that one. My bad! laugh

Well, no point in looping the conversation by repeating myself more than I already have, so I'll leave it at that. :]

Originally Posted by mrfuji3
I think it just really comes down to the models. If the models look like children, that's problematic. If the models look like small adults (dwarf-, human-, or other-like), then that's fine honestly. Short does not necessarily mean child.

100% agree.

Originally Posted by mrfuji3
I think it's a Tolkien thing that female dwarves have beards...?

Ooooh, you're correct! If I recall it right, all dwarves had beards (or at the very least very bushy sideburns) from early on in Tolkien universe. *thinking* I even remember Aragons comment about it in "The Two Towers" (EE) now when you say it. ... ... *shudders* :|

Last edited by Dez; 25/12/21 11:40 PM.

Hoot hoot, stranger! Fairly new to CRPGs, but I tried my best to provide some feedback regardless! <3 Read it here: My Open Letter to Larian