Wrath of the righteous looks incredibly good and so does BG3.
WOTR does appear to be offering a lot more mechanics through mythics paths where you can become angels, devils and liches ect....it looks really really frickin good....like really good. WOTR also possibly looks to have better story writing and companions. Owlcat are based in Poland and arent necessarily all about diversity and gender neutral crap like Larian is. I think Larain have gone waaaayyyyy to far with this stuff and Owlcat have completely tuned it down eg Larian has gone woke and Owlcat are not woke.
BG3 on the other hand looks better visually and i think has more potential due to there budget.
Thoughts people?
I actually stopped playing both games for different reasons. Don't get me wrong: Wrath of the Righteous, Pathfinder Kingmaker and Baldur's Gate 3 are good games.
(1) Wrath of the Righteous and Pathfinder Kingmaker are simply too large Sorry, I know others might think different, but you could make 3 games out of them and still have enough content. (2) On the plus side, Owlcat games have a consistent world and narration. Yes, there are some nice Goblins (Nok-Nok!!), but most Goblins are evil. Yes, there are Elves, but they are rare and not overly common. (3) Baldur's Gate 3 has a slightly wacky, unhinged world and storytelling that is constantly breaking immersion. But it's certainly beautiful.
Concerning the OP's comments about "Woke": There are more than enough games that focus on entertaining and challenging players with interesting philosophical ideas instead of preaching politics. It is simple to find them and many of them are AAA blockbusters - Witcher 3, Old World, Pathfinder Kingmaker, Skyrim etc.
Sorry, I know others might think different, but you could make 3 games out of them and still have enough content.
