Obviously the game has DOS2 DNA, why say that like it's a bad thing though? This is the same thing as a book series being continued by another author after the original author has gone and died.
What people need to get in their heads is that it isn't Bioware making this game. That old Bioware which made BG1 / BG2 is dead and buried, it wouldn't ever be possible for them to be ressurected and make a sequel.
There will be connections to the first two games story wise and like Harbs Narbs says in his video that's more than enough to call it BG3 and try to deal with the high standards that the game will be held to.
Other than that, even though it has DOS2 DNA, the way the game expresses it is already vastly different.
Last edited by Chroniver; 27/01/22 06:47 PM.
