Originally Posted by Wormerine
Originally Posted by Chroniver
Obviously the game has DOS2 DNA, why say that like it's a bad thing though?
Because, in my personal opinion, D:OS2 isn't very good, and more importantly, I didn't enjoy playing it. So as a Baldur's Gate fan, and Baldur's Gate legacy fan (later bioware games, Obsidian etc) I don't want to see that stuff in BG3. Just as I don't like Bethesda Fallouts, while being a Fallout fan (1&2&New Vegas).
I agree entirely, and also agree that this game is not truly a Baldur's Gate game. I wouldn't go so far as to claim it is D:OS3, but it is more D:OS than it is BG. The "BG" in the game title is undeserved (thus far).