This time i decided to make a little social experiment ...
First spoiler is just about you acusing me from something and me explaining you why you are wrong, with examples, diagrams, pictures and graphics (well, just examples laugh ) ... second part is actualy on topic ...

Feel free to compare how much shorter would my posts be if you would actualy READ them before you react. wink

Originally Posted by GM4Him
Like I said Ragnarok, you disagree.
Just out of curisosity ... with what exactly?

Originally Posted by GM4Him
No need to be rude about it and accuse me of being illogical.
Okey, have it your way ... how im i suppose to call an argument that contradicts itself?

Please pick wich statement you concider logical and tell me why:
1) More danger in game -> players being more carefull -> resting less often.
2) More danger in game -> players being more carefull -> resting more often.

Originally Posted by GM4Him
Just because YOU don't see the logic in things, doesn't mean there's no logic there.
True ...
But since "all the others" are unable to show me where that "present logic" is, i find i kinda hard to believe.

Right now it seems more like: Just because YOU want to see the logic in things, doesn't mean there's logic there. smile

I mean, if its right there ... just show me and i gladly admit that i was wrong. smile

Here is my claim for you to have example:
Saying that people will rest less if random encoutners will be implemented is false.
Bcs with random encounters world become more dangerous place ... therefore players will feel stronger urge to keep their power up, therefore they will recharge more often.

Cause and effect, simple rules. smile

Originally Posted by GM4Him
Hey. If others agreed with you and told me I'm being totally illogical and there's nothing good at all in what I said, I'd be inclined to wonder if maybe I'm totally off base.
Well ... one would say that i would have to say that in the first place so they can "agreed with me". laugh
(Yes, talking about that part "there is nothing good at all" ... lets not play a scapegoat here, shall we?)

Also, those "others" would need at least show minimal acnowledge of both sides ... to be taking under concideration for "who have majority" argument.
I mean, we both know that most people simply skips all my posts for various reasons ... hardly you can agree or disagree with anything you didnt even bother to read. wink

Originally Posted by GM4Him
However, if you notice, most of what I pointed out as benefits of random encounters, other people have said also.
Or, you just managed to get people who want random encounters express their support to suggestion to include random encounters.
I gues we will never know.

Originally Posted by GM4Him
But you fail to recognize your own contradictions.
Now this is a straight lie ...
Sad part is that im affraid you know it. :-/

Originally Posted by GM4Him
On the one hand, you're very opposed to people using exploits.
Really?
I wonder when i did that ... if you could provide me at least single example it would be much appreciated. smile

BTW ... pardon my poor english, but what exactly is difference between "being opposed to someone" and "totally against the same people" ?
I mean in my language "opposition" litteraly means being "against something", so ... as i understand is being opposed to people using exploits, would be exactly the same as being totally against people using exploits ...
Wich i never was. laugh

Originally Posted by GM4Him
Then, on the other hand, you're totally against people potentially using random encounters as an exploit.
You mean that part where i litteraly told you that i never said im pro or against this potential exploit, and i was only pointing out that this opourtunity is there?

[toxic sarcasm]
Well ... i gues you got me there, totally contradicting something i never said by something else i never said. laugh
It look like you are perfectly right and not at all like if you are ignoring me and just keep repeating the same. smile
[/toxic sarcasm]

Originally Posted by GM4Him
You have no problems with long rest spamming exploits, and height wins every time exploits and shoving exploits and drinking potions as bonus action exploits and stealth exploits and broken exploits like freezing an enemy in dialogue so you can easily sneak around behind him with every other character and steal everything from that person in real time while that person is frozen forever in turn based mode, and so on and so forth.
No i dont ...
I wonder if you know why. smile

Wanna know?
Its quite easy actualy and i said it at least thousand times allready ... bcs theese things can be easily avoided. laugh
I have no problems with any of those, bcs i simply ignore them and they stop exist for me ... if someone want to use them, i dont care, its his game and his 60€
I shall not, and therefore i see litteraly no reason for me to care about them. smile

Originally Posted by GM4Him
But, for some reason, you are so upset about the possibility that someone could use random encounters to increase their loot and experience points?
No im not ...
It might surprise you, but that is the reason i told you in my last post that im not. laugh

Let me repeat it for you:
"Well if you read it properly you can find out i never said im not okey with it ... i just pointed out that this potential is there. smile "
See? Not even single word about me being upset ... or even against it ... on the contrary im litteraly telling you that this conclusion is false one.

Or do you want me to repeat that first sentence? Okey, no problem:
"Wich create both XP and Loot exploit potential."
See? Again not even single word about being upset, expressing displease, or anyhow pointing out that is wrong ... simple statement of possibility, nothing more, nothing less. wink

You know this posts will be MUCH shorter if you actualy acnowledge what i say. laugh

Originally Posted by GM4Him
If you receive a random encounter once maybe every thirty minutes to an hour of gameplay, how is that a major exploit in the game?
As i said there is no such thing as "major" or "minor" exploit ...
There are exploits, and based on who is using it, in what situation is he using it, or what benefits it will bring him ... every exploit can be big or small ... depending on those circumstances.

But lets say every 30 minutes ...
Right now EA (if you do it whole) is worth aproximately cca 20h or gameplay.
That would mean 40 encounters.
Im too lazy to count them right now ... but from just quick look it seems like amount of combat was at least doubled. laugh
Wich obviously also means double amount of XP, amount of loot, amount of long rests and everything else related to combat.

And you are asking how is that an exploit? laugh
The exploit potential is that you can easily just return to the same place over and over and over and over and kill yet another and another and another and another "randomly" spawned NPCs ... to get yet another and another and another and another loot and XP ...

This is basicaly "infinite gold" and "infinite XP" mod. laugh

[sarcasm]
I believe the game will be much harder when group of level 7 players in full magic gear will attack Minthara in her goblin camp, bcs they spend 4h killing the same group of bandits in the crypt.
Doesnt sound exploitable at all to me. laugh
[/sarcasm]

Originally Posted by GM4Him
On the contrary, you can literally use stealth in every situation to win, or you can literally freeze an enemy in dialogue, switch to characters not in dialogue or combat, move around in real time and position yourself so you can attack the enemy over and over again from the best possible position, and win every time. Or, spider lair, you can just wait until she's on a web, multiple times, and shoot her down so she loses like 20 HP a drop until she's almost dead.

Yes you can ...
Your point?

Just bcs something worse exists doesnt mean that bad things that are not so bad sudently become good. laugh
Yes, they are "lesser evil" compared to "greater evil" ... but noticed the therm?
Its still evil. wink

Originally Posted by GM4Him
But most of all, you WANT them to make it so you can long rest all the time so that when the game gets to spellcasters hurling fireballs you can literally use them in every battle, long rest, and use them again in every battle spamming them and making every other class completely obsolete. Makes absolutely no sense.
Not sure how im i suppose to understand this sentence ... are you speaking about me speficily or in general? laugh

Since if you were adressing me, no i dont ... but even i would it make no difference, from what Swen want. smile
That is the reason why i restrict myself from resting too often ... for one it takes away my fun to burn everything with strongest spell possible, and i play to have fun ... and two (wich is probably more important for me) resting is mostly anoyance, i rather explore, fight and resolve puzzle than sit around the fire and listen the same old conversations i allready heared thousand times before. laugh

BUT if you were talking in general ... i still think "you" dont. laugh
I mean, keeping in mind less experienced players *i* think its good think that Larian decided to allow us rest almost anytime ... but *i* also believe that we should not be able to rest everytime.
Hag lair is perfect example, i love the place ... no, there is nothing stopping me from runing out and rest as much as i need, on the other hand i also dont need to
laugh but if someone do, the game is totally playable for him aswell. Wich is important.

Sure this problem will be void once difficiulties will be introduced, but until then we just have to all play at same playfield. smile

Originally Posted by GM4Him
Random Encounters during travel, if done right, would only add a small element of risk for the purpose of making players be on guard at all times.
Again that vague "if done right" ... well, surprise surprise, anything that is "done right" is "done right". Who would expect that? laugh
The question is what does it even mean "done right"?

Originally Posted by GM4Him
If you never know when you might suddenly drop into combat, you aren't going to use your high powered spells constantly in case you get suddenly jumped by a troll or a couple of gnolls or ogres or whatever.
Sure ... you can either save it, or restore it asap.
Both approaches are valid.

In either way the point is the same "to have prepared your hight powered spells ... just in case".
I simply believe that you have to take both in concideration, since THAT is the situation. laugh

[quote=GM4Him]Here's what I mean. I just got done fighting Ragzlin. I have 1 HP for one character, 9 HP for another, 5 HP for another and 4 HP for another. Game has no random encounters, and I know I've just cleared a huge portion of the game map. Inside the goblin base, there are no enemies at all. Now, if there are no random encounters, I don't need to worry about healing at all. Why bother? There are no enemies left. So why should I waste potions? Why should I waste a short rest? I'm good. Area cleared.
Ah an example. smile Excelent!

Lets see ...
Well, this is a good one, i agree you dont need to "bother" with healing after all your enemies are done ...
Lets put aside for a second that you dont know if *all* your enemies are done, unless you are metagaming ...

I think its totally safe for you to dont bother with healing at all and ... and what exactly? laugh
Sory i just dont see any conclusion here.

I mean the important question is what will you with your 1HP, 9HP, 5HP and 4HP halfdead party do now?
If that is gameover for you, then yes it really dont mean anything how much HP you have left.
If you go loot, and then teleport to vendor to sell it ... then i gues it doesnt matter either.
If you will heal them with cleric, since you dont need to worry about your spellslots ... well you can aswell long rest. laugh
If you went to explore, then i gues you made a misstake ... did you noticed all those skelletons we are looting in games? Especialy those who have healing potions by themselves? Well, those are adventurers who decided to "not waste a potion" and then trigger some trap. laugh

I would need this example to lead somewhere. laugh
This tells me nothing, you described the situation and thats it.

Originally Posted by GM4Him
But, if there's the potential that while I'm trying to work my way out I might random encounter 2 ochre jellies, or 2 hobgoblins, or 3 more roaming goblins, or 2 giant spiders, or whatever, a sense of danger is created in the game. I COULD risk trying to get out without healing, and I would probably succeed because the chance of a random encounter in the goblin base is maybe 10% chance on a dice roll every 300 feet of movement or something like that. Well, am I willing to risk it, or should I heal just in case I am unlucky and encounter something I won't be able to handle? This creates potential dangers that can occur at any moment, since you won't know when it was that the game rolled the last time to determine if you encounter a random encounter. It makes you strategize and think, and it adds a "living" element to the world. It isn't just some stagnant map where nothing ever changes unless it's scripted, and once you've played the game through once, you know exactly what to expect. You never know when something will jump out at you, so you best not be stupid and continue roaming a hostile camp with very little health, etc.
This is interesting scenario ... a little idealistic tho, but interesting.

As i allready said, the main problem with PC game is that everything litteraly "needs to be scripted" ... so, yup things still dont change, unless someone in Larian will implement several variatiaons of the same encounter. laugh
(note that when you create two versions for one encounter its no longer matter of "chance" that players will not see one of them, that is certain)

You say "It makes you strategize and think" ... i say it makes me use one of my bzillion potions, healing scrolls, or tons of food for long rest.
Its the most logical move. :-/
Sure you can explore damaged and at half strength ... but the less you know about your surroundings, the less rational move it would be. laugh
So the only way to as you say "done right" random encounters would be rework whole game. :-/

Originally Posted by GM4Him
And, now to Draigo's point, random encounters is meant to prevent rest spam. If you know you could be attacked by a troll if you long rest in goblin camp, but there's no chance of it if you rest in the Druid's Grove, you'll make sure you rest at Druid's Grove and not try to long rest while exploring the goblin base.
That is exactly it ... if the mechanic is negated so easily as by clicking on fast travel ... why even bother with it?
Game companies usualy try to remove as much of "just running around" as possible (except survival games, there its usualy core part of design) its called Quality of Life improvements.

One of example for quality of life improvement is ability to "magicaly trade items between characters" without need to do that manualy.
Or another would be ability to send things to camp ... instead of traveling there, put item to the chest, and traveling back.
Or yet another would be ability to fast travel from everywhere, instead forcing us to roam back and forth between Vendor and Loot waypoints.

If you add the thing that in spiders cave i can be attacked when long resting, what is holding me back from simply travel outside to rest?
Nothing.
So what exactly does this feature add? It effectively added five minutes of our characters jogging through the spider cave. laugh

Originally Posted by GM4Him
You make it sound like a troll would be easy to take out, so spam long rest more frequently so you can trigger the troll early. That would be foolish. Why? Because after you've wasted all your spells on the troll, you try to long rest again and might, maybe run into a couple of hobgoblins as well.
How?
When i travel to my camp ... i find a Troll there ... so i waste all my spellslots on him and kill him ... now i AM in my camp, and it is clean, since i just cleaned it ...

Why (and more important how) would i "try to long rest again" ?
I simply crawl to my tent after i kill a Troll and rest, there is no try. laugh

Originally Posted by GM4Him
AND, if they prevent you from simply teleporting from anywhere back to Druid's Grove, then it works. OR, if you try to fast travel, they implement a random encounters interruption potential every time you fast travel, symbolizing that you traveled on foot to the nearest portal and there was a chance that you might encounter something on the way. Either way, limiting long rest spamming, as Draigo said, is essential to later levels of spellcasting. (Plus everything else he said.)
I believe you noticed that they added option to "run from combat" in ... im not sure if that was last patch, or some previous to be honest ... well, anyway in the past. laugh

So what exactly is holding me back from simply play "all in" and if i just happen to walk into a hard random encounter in both Long Rest, or Fast Travel ...
To simply run away and then do the same action without the encounter?

I mean sure, you can say that encounters will not dissapear, they can theoreticaly keep waiting for us forewer ...
In that case you just created scenario, when Random Number Generator is just generating Game Over for unexperienced new players.
Does that seem like fun to you? :-/

I mean dont get me wrong, i allready noticed that you are creating the best possible game experience for *youreself* ... but think about it for a second, would you? wink


I still dont understand why cant we change Race for our hirelings. frown
Lets us play Githyanki as racist as they trully are! frown