Can you refute my points with counterpoints that aren't just assertions saying you're right and I'm wrong?
This pretty much sums it up. I'm not going to debate every single line of text in a long post with a counterargument to everything just to "win" in a thread. Many of your arguments you use to try to shut down a poster don't hold water. "Shove isn't OP because Pushing Attack is better" - you compare a universal Bonus Action with a specific class ability that has limited uses. Or "drinking potions isn't needed because you can have a Cleric in the party" - completely irrelevant what another character can do to influence the fight, otherwise you have to consider the Wizard as well who can fireball the entire encounter so you don't have to make any BA decisions. Going over every detail with neverending arguments like these isn't appealing.
I was trying to get a discussion going on a fighting style that is considered inferior in 5e by the D&D community, which was further made less appealing by Larian's new homebrew Bonus Actions of which I mentioned 3 examples. I hope that could happen without degenerating into "you're completely wrong, I proved it!".
