Ragnarok talking about "immersion" it's hypocrisis. Firstly "immersion" and "realism" are two different things. Secondly, in the definition of "immersion" of Ragnarok, we could kill LOT OF THINGS with just ONE HIT cause damn one cut froma sword or one shot from an arrow is enough to kill a lot of people.
So screw your damn "immersive" harpies who throw rocks cause they have "thumbs"...
It's a game and yeah, the gameplay of BG3 is crappy as hell. Saying otherwise is pure fanboyism (and a bad one).
If an unkown developpers did the exact same game without BG licence, people would have be "meh" some goods things, lot of bad things. It's a "meh" game, unbalanced, some shitty dialogues, etc etc.
Don't doubt your opinion just because after 2 years 90% of the BG3 forum are non-objectives fans of Larian/BG/DD2 all mixed in a disgusting cocktail.
Because in the "immersive" world of Ragnarok, Dragons would throw mountains rocks from the sky and kill all your party in one shot cause... they have thumbs and they have wings.... and they are smaaaaaart.
This kind of comments are just like this game, "meh" at best, "crap" to be honest.
PS : harpies looks like to be super smart and slaves dumbs ? Why ? Brains are in wings ? No ? Who cares ! Let's say no sense and defend Larian by all means !
