Dunno ... didnt read it ...
I told you allready and in several occasions that i dont care about your fabricated scenarios. :-/
How should i say it ...
The problem that your scenarios create is that there is MANY (and i mean REALLY MANY) possible actions in every step ...
But since you are playing all characters, you are allways picking those that exactly suits your desired outcome ... you even get one step futher, since you are deciding who will hit, who will miss, how many damage they do ... everything.
What im trying to say is that everyone can be chessmaster who is giving Checkmate with 3rd move ... when playing against himself. :-/
But the value of such game is none.
First, how else shall I give you solid examples but to pull out some dice, and play out scenarios that, by the way, are similar to BG3 scenarios? I don't decide who hits. I roll for everything using the scenarios, and you'd know that if you read them. I try to be legit fair as much as possible because being not fair helps no one. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong.
And the scenarios are, naturally me deciding who will do what. How else should I do it? Are we going to get a D&D session going? I try to legit make the scenarios as intelligent as possible, making decisions that would make sense and be solid strategic decisions based on the different versions of D&D being used. I even tried to keep the scenarios as legit similar as possible, so it would be as unbiased as possible.
Interesting that you asked for an example, I gave you 2, and you didn't read them. Hmmm. Then you just write them off as me creating my own biased scenarios.
