Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Originally Posted by Alexlotr
Who said both?
You did:

Originally Posted by Alexlotr
Originally Posted by RagnarokCzD
Except you come to your turn more often, and it takes less rounds to finish the batte ...
Except you come to your turn more often, and it takes less rounds to finish the batte ...
Wrong. I compare 2 different cases - arguing for 4 vs 6 and agruing for 2 vs 4. And the arguments in those cases can be the same.

4 has no objective advantages over 3, 5, 6 or 2. It's just a limit for the sake of a limit. They should allow us to change it. And we're not asking for 200 party memebers.

6 was the max group size in BG 1-2 so...