Just like with the "cartoonishness" and the "lighthearted lulz tone" arguments, it's amusing to see how little people remember/choose to remember about BG1 and 2 when looking to find any arguments against BG3's visuals/writing/anything, really.
You're conflating two groups and in an odd way to boot; the people who remark that BG3 is far more zany/over-the-top with its particular brand of humor compared to its predecessors are among the first to point out the first two games
did feature nudity/sex/sexuality.
the BG games have always been pervy
P.S. The presence of nudity/sex/sexuality does not automatically/inherently indicate perversion, despite what some people think.
