Originally Posted by geala
For example +2 from heights. It is not in the 5e DnD rules, which is nonsense because height usually gives advantage in real combat situations, so the DnD rules are dump.
I love how people use one thing that Larian implemented well and no one has issue with (after a lengthy backlash to the initial implementation which was broken as hell) to defend their messy system. It is still arguably a simplified version of DnD rule of Cover. I think it works well, but that's one good thing, among a sea of bad things.

I do agree that the poll carries quite a lot of judgement in the way it described both choices. So do yours smile

And no, BG3 isn't more tactical - it's too unbalanced and too chaotic for that. "Tactical" suggests some basic level of depth and balance that BG3 simply lacks. Hopefully it will get there in a year's time.