Originally Posted by Wormerine
Originally Posted by Archaven
really loving grid based as it seems to be more tactical? now if only larian can make bg3 grid based? loving the cover, the reactions the most in solasta.
If I would like BG3 to adopt one thing from Solasta it would be reactions.

Grid is a very clear system, but I don't think BG3 needs it. What it needs is clarity of what can or will happen when you make a move. BG3 got much better since release, but I still find disengagement to be a bit wonky.

I didn't play too much of new Solasta campaign, but from what I have seen it is a straight up improvement compared to the base campaign.
https://imgur.com/hAgnK2W

I'm not sure if Larian's DOS engine able to translate it to grid-based. Perhaps Larian technical team can shed more light into that. Personally, I find grid-based more tactical and kinda love it. I understand that BG3 map is huge and it doesn't make sense for grid-based. It's fine with me. However, i really really want Solasta reaction system in BG3. It seems to me reaction, concentration, light and dark vision is kinda big deal in dnd5e. Correct me if i'm wrong.

However, is there a thread to discuss the classes? Is it me or i find ranger is better than rogue in terms of damage? Not sure if this is permitted, if Rogue they allow to add Sneak Attack damage to off-hand then i would say i would be on par with Ranger due to the number of attacks.