People having to expect to relie on MODS to do this is sad. Larian isn't an Indie dev anymore. Gives us options. This is a 60$+ D&D/baldur's gate RPG game.
For an D&D RPG tactical game yea its way too small. Wish we had 5, 6 party members. Archer , rogue, wizards, Cleric, Barbarian, Paladin all have a chance to shine. More options more interesting battles. I just cant understand why people are in the <less is better> camp for that element.
No it's not way to small, the larger the group the more pointless each member becomes. You are basically asking for the game to be Warhammer and the "party" being an army. That is not the game we have seen in EA so far, battles is not the main objective of BG3. Most of the battles has a way to entirely avoid them, what are you going to do with those 10 party members?
This isn't a combat simulator.
Are you serious ?! ROFL.
"(in an RPG game) The larger the group the more pointless each member becomes" <Larian BG3 forums- May 2022>
Are you trying to compare controlling an ARMY from a strategy war game to a D&D Baldur's gate like story driven RPG game with a potential party of 6 that has dialogue, variety of builds and classes??? Talk about taking things to the next level of idiocy.
Lets just have a single character then in our tactical RPGs to deal with then ? Its so much more interesting. Oh but wait, 4 is FINE you say? Uh, and why is that? lol.
