What kind of an answer is that?
Filling the missing options ...
Yup, bad GM can make a bad decision ...
And also good (or at least not horrible) decision can be made by any GM ... but concidered bad decision by bad player.
I dunno how to say this ... not everything you say is pure gold, just bcs you like it?
Something like that ... and yes, i know it apply to me aswell.
In the FR setting, non-magical weapons don't float mid-air in normal circumstances, where "normal"=no magic involved.
Besides, let's face it, weapons are not floating mid-air
Im confused right now ...
Maybe i read it wrong ...
But the first sentence is "i dont like weapons floating" ... and second is "weapons dont float" ... so ... ???
Can you please clearly state wich side you stand for? O_o
it's a feature screaming "YOU ARE IN A VIDEOGAME, THIS IS NOT REAL, WEAPONS ARE STICK ON THE BACK BECAUSE WE DIDN'T BOTHER TO PUT A PROPER ANIMATION (THAT WE HAD IN OUR PREVIOUS GAMES BTW)" in your face.
Its certainly one possible way to see it. :-/
I allways thought it just say "we (as Larian) find this looking better".
Now seems to me you are just arguing for the sake of it.
Case in point ... or point in case? I never know ...
This is exactly what i was talking about up in the beginning ...
Either someone can make a bad decision (stupid rule, arguing just for the fun, w/e)
Or people can falsely judge it as such (dont follow big picutre, missinterpret, w/e)
You are the one who was complaining about people wanting to change the game to their liking to the detriment of your own experience (e.g. fast travel) while they could have "just ignored" those features they were complaining about.
I still do.
And now? Now you are defending a clearly bad feature, that doesn't make any logical sense not in-game nor in the real world and from which NO ONE would suffer if it was corrected.
I know you concider it a "bad feature" ... even tho right now im not exactly sure what about it you mind honestly ... but that doesnt make it bad. :-/
Bad for you (and some others) maaaaybe ... but hardly anything more.
What kind of "logical sense" you want?
Personaly i believe that NO ONE (if you insist on caps lock) would suffer if option to sheat weapons on hips would be simply added to the curent state ... as far as i know, daggers are sheating there (even tho it is some time i used them, so maybe i just have outdated info) ...
So the only thing that would hold Larian back (the animation) is allready implemented.
And for the record, this option would be the only ting i would call "correction" in this particular case ... and this is something i keep asking from since the first day "sheat on back stupid" topic was bring up for the first time. :-/
So ... im not against corection at all, mine is dust different from others.
For example GM4Him was strictly against this option ... wonder why to be honest. O_o
But doubt he would ever tell me. :-/
Honestly Rag, without malice, name a single negative aspect if the weapons in this game were properly sheeted.
I would not like it ...
Now you!
Name a single negative aspect if the weapons in this game would have option to sheet both on the hip or on back, whenever and for whatever reason you choose to ...
And just in case you would like to also turn the game into positive matters:
Note that options could include stuff like: Vissible shields (since back slot would be possibly opened), vissible bows while vielding meele, vissible meele while wielding bow, quivers on back or hips, prefferably option to hide daggers ... etc.
