Originally Posted by Tuco
Originally Posted by Rhobar121
These games have a lot of problems and they are quite serious, so it is justified.
And if it does not bother someone, it is his business.
Yeah, sure. Whatever floats your boat.
It's just amusing to see that same super-harsh standards aren't applied to other titles that have just as many problems, if not arguably worse ones.

There are several aspects of DOS 1, 2 and (admittedly, to a lesser degree SO FAR) BG3 that annoy me just as much if not MORE than anything wrong with Kingmaker or Wrath of the Righteous.
Not to mention there's also plenty of foregone conclusions about "TERRIBLE THINGS" the two Owlcat games do and "shouldn't do" that I simply disagree with.

Case in point: for all its shortcoming, I'll take a flawed Kingdom management over a game not even ATTEMPTING to give some sense of scale to its own central adventure.

Your will, but for me if one of the game's main features is half finished and boring then that's a big downside.
I don't even mention the combat system, but rather the dubious encounters project, because I wrote about it a dozen pages ago.
If you do not mind, your choice.

Last edited by Rhobar121; 27/06/22 06:54 PM.