Originally Posted by stevelin7
Originally Posted by robertthebard
Wow. Two people that completely miss the point, in one exchange? Sadly, I addressed this in the very post you almost quoted here. Being ok with the "one night stand" vibe doesn't mean I'm ok with how the comp's sexuality is handled overall, even if I do understand why it's handled in this way. Unless we're only allowed to play a male Tav? Was there a "hotfix" today that changed that? Because if not, it's entirely possible that the Tav that you're so concerned about having "male on male action" with is, in fact, female. As to the flirts, I've seen worse behavior between straight men. Old bikers and construction workers aren't necessarily SFW, well, in an office setting...

the issue is that bisexual isn't so common, or yes, they are common, but just few(1% !? maybe) in the world.

but suddenly your companions are all bisexual, isn't this a nightmare for the companions' sexuality!??

...and yet another that fails a comprehension check.

Although, I am going to have to see some links to wherever you're getting "suddenly bisexual" from. So, here's a hypothetical for you: We get Alfira as a comp, and you want to romance her on your male Tav, and find out that she's a lesbian. Are you:

A. going to accept that she's a lesbian, and go on;
B. Use your tadpole to manipulate her
C. Come to the forums to complain
D. Wait for the mod that changes her, so you can have the romance you want.

This is why they're written as they are for now. Whether I agree with it or not, which I've already made more than clear to those that read what I actually say, that's how they're done, and why they're done in this way. It's all good to disagree with it, I do, but I can also accept the logic behind the decision, whether I like it or not.